This week, Pakistan turns 60 years old. One man, Muhammad Ali Jinnah, is the reason the country exists at all. Historian Stanley Wolpert said that it is very uncommon for one person to change the course of history and even less common for one person to change the map of the world. He also said that very few people can be credited with making a nation-state just by willpower.
All three were done by Muhammad Ali Jinnah. On August 15, 1947, Jinnah became the first governor general of the new country of Pakistan. Gandhi, Mountbatten, and Nehru are better known names in the history of independence and partition than Jinnah, who Pakistanis call “Qaid e Azam” (the father of the nation).
Even though I was born and raised in Britain, I only knew Jinnah as a man that all Pakistanis should respect and admire. At the age of 14, my family visited Pakistan and I remember visiting his marble mausoleum. At that time, I didn’t know much about Jinnah’s life. All I knew was that he was a hero because without him, there would have been no Pakistan. Early this year, I went back to Pakistan for a BBC Radio 4 show about Jinnah. I traveled all over the country to try to learn more about who Jinnah was and how much modern Pakistan is like the country he dreamed of.
On a typical hot morning, I went back to Karachi to see Jinnah’s tomb again. It was a beautiful white tomb set in gardens where many Pakistanis were spending the afternoon with their families. They told me they were there to honor their great leader, but as I looked around the museum, I couldn’t help but wonder if the people who were honoring him really knew what he stood for. Pakistan is now known for its military rule and support of Islamic extremism, but its founder was a dapper Anglophile who liked billiards and drove a Bentley. One gushing biography said he “sounded like Ronald Coleman, dressed like Anthony Eden, was adored by most women and admired by most men.” Did the men with beards and women wearing burkas know that Jinnah liked drinking and, some reports say, even eating ham sandwiches?
Jinnah was already very sick with tuberculosis when the country was split up. He died on September 11, 1948, leaving a nation that had only been formed a year before. In the years since, Pakistanis have been arguing ever since about Jinnahs vision for Pakistan. He fought hard for India’s Muslims to have their own country, but in his first speech as governor general, he told the people of Pakistan, “You are free to go to your mosques or any other place of worship in this state of Pakistan.” Your religion, caste, or creed doesn’t matter; it has nothing to do with the state’s business. After talking to people who knew and studied him, I became more and more sure that Jinnah wanted Pakistan to be a progressive, secular country. I also became more and more sure that if he were alive today, he would be very unhappy with the country he helped build.
Without Jinnah, there would be no Pakistan. But looking at how India and Pakistan have done over the last 60 years also made me wonder if partition might have been a mistake. The separation of India and Pakistan had a terrible effect on people. One million people were killed in the months before the partition, which caused the biggest migration in history.
India is now hot, looking to the future, and economically strong after sixty years. Pakistan, on the other hand, is still stuck in the contradictions that led to its creation and is controlled by the mullahs and the military. India’s people can talk about its history that goes back thousands of years. Pakistan, on the other hand, is a country that was formed on ancient land but is younger than my mother. Muhammad Ali Jinnah was sure that Muslims would suffer in a united India. He may have been right about this, but when you think about the two wars that India and Pakistan have fought and the huge amounts of money that both countries have spent on defense, you have to wonder if Jinnah’s faith in separation as a solution was misplaced.
Salman Rushdie wrote in his book Shame that Pakistan was a “place insufficiently imagined.” When you think about its troubled history, maybe it’s not so bad that it was ever imagined at all.
Muhammad Ali Jinnah, the founder of Pakistan, remains one of the most revered yet controversial political leaders in South Asian history While Jinnah’s vision and political acumen are widely acknowledged, there has been significant debate around his personal habits, particularly his dietary preferences as a Muslim Speculation that Jinnah consumed pork and alcohol have persisted for decades, despite scarce concrete evidence. In this article, we will analyze the available information to determine whether these claims hold merit.
Jinnah’s Significance as a Leader
Before analyzing Jinnah’s alleged pork consumption it is important to understand his significance. Jinnah was instrumental in the creation of Pakistan in 1947 having advocated for an independent Muslim homeland in the Indian subcontinent. As leader of the All-India Muslim League, Jinnah articulated the Two Nation Theory, which held that Hindus and Muslims constituted separate nations who could not live in a united India. His unwavering commitment to this cause ultimately led to the partition of British India into India and Pakistan.
Jinnah served as Pakistan’s first Governor-General until his death in 1948. He laid the foundations of the new state, shaping its governance and policies. Revered as Quaid-e-Azam (Great Leader) and Baba-e-Qaum (Father of the Nation), Jinnah remains an iconic figure in Pakistan, with numerous monuments and institutions bearing his name. His personal integrity and adherence to Muslim beliefs are central to his public image.
Origins of the Pork Consumption Rumor
In the context of Jinnah’s stature as a Muslim leader, the notion that he violated Islamic dietary laws by eating pork seems incongruous. However, rumors to this effect have circulated for decades. Proponents point to several reported incidents:
-
British author Stanley Wolpert claimed in 1984 that Jinnah enjoyed ham sandwiches and Stilton cheese, citing interviews with Jinnah’s sister Fatima. Wolpert’s biography of Jinnah sparked major controversy in Pakistan.
-
In 2003, Jinnah’s associate Abdul Ghaffar Khan stated that Jinnah enjoyed pork sausages at breakfast.
-
Author Akbar Ahmed claimed Jinnah ordered pork chops and wine while dining at Hotle Savoy in Mussoorie in 1946.
-
Some have highlighted Jinnah’s partiality for dressing in Western style clothing as further evidence of anglicized tastes at odds with Islamic strictures.
Critics argue these anecdotes lack solid proof, are based on hearsay, and should be discounted in light of more credible accounts.
Counter-Arguments and Inconclusive Evidence
Those skeptical of the pork-eating narrative make several arguments countering it:
-
Contemporaneous accounts do not mention Jinnah consuming pork; this claim surfaced decades after his death. His dietary habits were unlikely to have gone unnoticed.
-
His associates like Fatima Jinnah and Liaquat Ali Khan insisted he strictly adhered to Islamic laws. Jinnah prayed regularly and fasted during Ramadan.
-
As a skillful lawyer, Jinnah understood importance of witnesses and evidence. But no credible first-hand testimony exists of him eating pork.
-
Pork consumption would have jeopardized Jinnah’s position as the leader of Indian Muslims. He was astute enough to realize this.
-
Jinnah’s resistance to wearing the Muslim sherwani jacket stemmed from practical reasons. As a lawyer travelling across India, he found Western clothes more suitable.
Unfortunately, in the absence of definitive proof on either side, the question remains unsettled. No photographic or written documentation survives of Jinnah himself purchasing or ingesting pork or alcohol.
Anecdotal accounts are inadequate to conclusively prove his consumption of pork. However, they do highlight how Jinnah occasionally disregarded Islamic conventions in his personal life, even as he assumed the mantle of leading Muslims. His private dietary habits likely had a degree of independence from his public persona.
Jinnah’s Vision for India and Pakistan
This debate also intersects with the contested notion that Jinnah sought friendship between Muslims and Hindus after Partition. Proponents argue the pork controversy was concocted to undermine this vision of harmony. They cite Jinnah’s 11 August 1947 speech emphasizing religious freedom, as well as his hopes to return to his Bombay residence, Jinnah House.
However, critics contend such selective evidence distorts Jinnah’s overarching ideological commitment to the Two Nation Theory and Pakistan’s Islamic identity. This identity could not be compromised by his personal secularism. According to this perspective, highlighting his pork consumption serves as a reminder of Pakistan’s raison d’etre as a separate Muslim homeland.
In the end, insufficient evidence exists to conclusively prove whether Jinnah ate pork or not. Nonetheless, the ongoing intrigue around Jinnah’s diet underscores broader debates about his vision for South Asia, the contradictions between his public and private personae, and the complex interplay between secularism, Islam and nationalism in Pakistan. While Jinnah’s status as the Father of the Nation remains undiminished, the ambiguity surrounding his personal life ensures he continues to be a polarizing figure. The pork controversy thus reflects the manifold contradictions of Jinnah’s legacy in shaping modern South Asia.
Is it true that Jinnah loved eating pork sausages? | Quaid e Azam | History | Pakistan
FAQ
What was Muhammad Ali Jinnah’s favorite food?
Did pre Islamic Arabia eat pork?
What did Allah say about eating pork?
Was Jinnah a smoker?
Did Jinnah eat pork?
Besides, does this still prove Jinnah was eating pork because it isn’t mentioned anywhere, it could simply mean Jinnah was furious at Chagla letting the Muslim boy eat the sausage and the last line can be taken as a complete fabrication. PTV has gone digital with their content library.
Did the last line prove Jinnah was eating pork?
In my opinion it is either a fabrication or the writer molded it in some sense. Besides, does this still prove Jinnah was eating pork because it isn’t mentioned anywhere, it could simply mean Jinnah was furious at Chagla letting the Muslim boy eat the sausage and the last line can be taken as a complete fabrication.
What did Jinnah do for Pakistan?
As the first governor-general of Pakistan, Jinnah worked to establish the new nation’s government and policies, and to aid the millions of Muslim migrants who had emigrated from neighbouring India to Pakistan after the two states’ independence, personally supervising the establishment of refugee camps.
What did Jinnah ask the young boy?
Jinnah asked: “How dare you allow the young boy to eat pork sausages?” I said: “Look, Jinnah, I had to use all my mental faculties to come to a quick decision. The question was: should I let Jinnah lose his election or should I let the boy go to eternal damnation? I chose in your favour”. An Indian used this as an argument.